Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://103.65.197.75:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/169
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBird, Allan-
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-19T09:57:09Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-19T09:57:09Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.issn0969-5931-
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2023.102122-
dc.identifier.urihttp://103.65.197.75:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/169-
dc.description.abstractWe provide a comprehensive review of how cross-cultural competence (CCC) has been measured over the past half-century in order to more closely align theoretical constructs and empirical measures. Based on a content analysis of 68 academic and commercial CCC instruments and a supplemental survey of 160 experts, we review the approaches used in these instruments to conceptualize and quantify CCC, discuss their limitations, and recommend best practices and directions for future researchers and practitioners when selecting and using CCC instruments or developing new alternatives.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectCross-cultural competence Cultural intelligence Intercultural competence Global mindset Multicultural personality Measurement Systematic reviewen_US
dc.titleReviewing half a century of measuring cross-cultural competence: Aligning theoretical constructs and empirical measuresen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Prof Allan Bird -Reviewing half a century.pdf
  Restricted Access
3 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.