Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://103.65.197.75:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/132
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGhalke, Avinash-
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-09T07:06:59Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-09T07:06:59Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.other: 10.1111/irfi.12378-
dc.identifier.urihttp://103.65.197.75:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/132-
dc.description.abstractThe stakeholder theory predicts that corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities reduce the morale hazard prob lem between creditors and corporate firms and decrease the requirement of collaterals in debt transactions. Consistent with this theory, our analysis shows that there is a negative relationship between CSR and secured debt in a cross-section of firms. Further, by using the mandatory CSR regulation implemented in India as a quasi-natural experiment setting, we observe the same negative relationship across periods in firms that were impacted by the regulation. These results suggest that CSR activities may substitute collaterals for obtaining debt from financial institutions, especially banks.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherwileyen_US
dc.subjectcollateral requirement, corporate social responsibility, CSR regulations, moral hazard, natural experimenten_US
dc.titleSocial responsibility, moral hazard, and collateral requirement: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in Indiaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2023-IRFI.pdf
  Restricted Access
1.2 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.